[ back to Tom 7 Radar ]

p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
Urghhhhh (10 Apr 2007 at 17:39)
I hate: computers, linux, and legacy code today.
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
Cortney (cmu-211462.andrew.cmu.edu) – 04.10.07 17:46:10
Yes, now your blog is all angsty like LJ.

Have you checked to see if the radar LJ feed is fixed? I think it is.
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
Tom 7 (gs82.sp.cs.cmu.edu) – 04.10.07 17:47:56
And now my headphones broke.
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
Tom 7 (gs82.sp.cs.cmu.edu) – 04.10.07 17:55:44
Also, yes, I fixed my RSS feed. As far as I can tell by reading the specifications, it was a legal XML document (0x1B = ESC appears to be a legal Unicode character, and the XML spec says that documents can contain any Unicode characters with a few specific exceptions). But more than just Livejournal was rejecting it, so I figured I'd just remove the offensive byte for those parsers that are not yet ready for our Space Future.
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
Arthur (ctwboo101.ctw.utwente.nl) – 04.11.07 08:01:28
Don't we all?
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
Tom 7 (h-66-167-250-12.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) – 04.11.07 09:18:44
Well, usually I like at least one of those...
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
A.T. (adsl-76-211-187-119.dsl.austtx.sbcglobal.net) – 04.13.07 01:19:59
XML 1.0 Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] | [#x10000-#x10FFFF] ... "XML 1.1 allows the use of character references to the control characters #x1 through #x1F, most of which are forbidden in XML 1.0."
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
Tom 7 (h-66-167-250-12.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) – 04.13.07 09:58:26
Oh look at that, I guess I am announcing version 1.0 in the header... but then I am going and reading the 1.1 spec. Oops!
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
Adam (pool-72-77-31-156.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net) – 04.14.07 00:31:13
No one uses XML 1.1. It is a failure.
p
o
s
t

a

c
o
m
m
e
n
t
[ Tom 7 Radar  •  Tom 7 on Google+  •  on Twitter  •  on Facebook ]