|
|
| |
I us chopsfick so am the max underground.
intel fears and represses all other intell.
Be intell eat by using chopsticks!
Be intel eat by repressing page webs! |
| |
Cult of the dead cow? Weird. They're "underground" but basically just a humor e-zine. |
| |
Ouch! Intel's firewall blocks that. It is a webpage of EVIL. |
| |
1638. Anonymous (mtl149-99-185-34.dedicated.sprintdsl.ca) –
04 Aug 2004 16:59:03
[ Evolution Quote ]
Matter? Brain Matter? |
| |
1637. me (lalocachica05.mindsay.com) (dpc6682009035.direcpc.com) –
04 Aug 2004 02:55:51
[ Phew! ]
i love your fonts. i'm a webdesigner and a good font is such a must. you are great. i wish i could make fonts, lol i'd make one of my handwriting. again, great job! |
| |
1636. this is BS (ca208-ch02-bl07.il-chicago0.sa.earthlink.net) –
28 Jul 2004 23:42:22
[ FLAMING TEXT ]
hey everyone wat up???? |
| |
|
|
| |
1634. Osama Bin Laden (d47-69-35-91.try.wideopenwest.com) –
26 Jul 2004 11:17:14
[ Free Plexiglass! ]
I need some plexiglass. I will trade you anthrax. I put it in doggy bag! YOU KICK MY DOG. I kill you! No just kidding don't tell police. |
| |
1633. Osama Bin Laden (d47-69-35-91.try.wideopenwest.com) –
26 Jul 2004 11:15:25
[ Free Plexiglass! ]
I need some plexiglass. I will trade you anthrax. I put it in doggy bag! YOU KICK MY DOG. I kill you! No just kidding don't tell police. |
| |
1632. Tom 7 (h-67-101-139-49.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) –
24 Jul 2004 18:26:01
[ Quake 3 Done! ]
What kind of bounce? |
| |
1631. Pho (alg221.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) –
24 Jul 2004 13:55:16
[ Quake 3 Done! ]
can anybody tell me how to do a bounce without pads??? my mail is misiaczeq666@wp.pl |
| |
1630. Tom 7 (h-67-101-138-220.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) –
19 Jul 2004 17:51:09
[ Phew! ]
Yes, you're right. ;) |
| |
1629. Anonymous (pool-151-201-125-84.pitt.east.verizon.net) –
19 Jul 2004 02:35:39
[ Phew! ]
I think you meant happy birthday !
|
| |
1628. Tom 7 (a80-186-106-86.elisa-laajakaista.fi) –
18 Jul 2004 23:16:38
[ Phew! ]
HELSINKI! |
| |
1627. Tom 7 (dell19.cspub.utu.fi) –
17 Jul 2004 06:26:12
[ Phew! ]
And then the farmer says... |
| |
1626. mike (h-67-101-138-220.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) –
16 Jul 2004 22:14:08
[ Phew! ]
wait wait, i think i've heard this joke.... |
| |
1625. cdinwood (p4088-ipad02sinnagasak.nagasaki.ocn.ne.jp) –
16 Jul 2004 19:22:35
[ Phew! ]
Any paper that involves a wonderful anecdote involving the reader making a fool of himself is automatically a thing of beauty, I believe. |
| |
1624. Tom 7 (dell10.cspub.utu.fi) –
14 Jul 2004 07:49:59
[ Nordic Track ]
Numbers and dishes both suck. |
| |
1623. mike (h-67-101-137-206.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) –
13 Jul 2004 21:29:36
[ Nordic Track ]
thanks for doing all your dishes before you left, it was a nice gesture. |
| |
1622. smath (minnow.msais.com) –
13 Jul 2004 17:20:09
[ Nordic Track ]
Tom7 - Good Luck overseas. Also, I don't understand your LICS presentation. There just aren't enough numbers involved.
|
| |
1621. Tom (Zoop) (c-67-171-68-253.client.comcast.net) –
07 Jul 2004 21:07:21
[ GIF nearly Free! ]
I had an average of 15% reduction. |
| |
Gifsicle is the best I know at optimizing gifs, especially animations. Did PNG win by a significant margin? It didn't in my tests. |
| |
1619. Tom (Huck) (c-67-171-68-253.client.comcast.net) –
07 Jul 2004 17:09:57
[ GIF nearly Free! ]
Simplicity is something i can accept.
I'm interested in what sorts of files PNG does worse on. I've tried 'convert' on a bunch of gifs i have sitting around, big and small, and PNG did better on all of them. (I used 'convert' which made them smaller than the GIFs. And then 'pngcrush' would make them even smaller.)
I can't find a GIF optimizing program right now, though. (Do you know of one?) So i dunno.
PNG is a better standard, don't let photoshop's craptasticy fool you. And i say that with no real authority. |
| |
Yes, I was referring to the indexed-color mode of PNGs. For the 24-bit stuff, there is no competition for PNG. I did a little experiment comparing indexed-color PNGs and GIFs, and the result was pretty much a wash -- PNGs with lots of colors (~256) are slightly smaller than GIFs (when compressed with 'state of the art' compressors), but very low-color GIFs are smaller than PNGs. Photoshop does a worse job of PNG export than it does with GIFs, though, so if you're not running pngcrush and gifsicle afterwards, then GIF will be smaller.
Anyway, IMO the simplicity of the GIF standard is a win. It is quite easy to generate GIFs with a small amount of code, but I don't share the same opinion of PNGs. |
| |