|
|
| |
Is the effort:payout ratio more absurd than with wikiplia?
|
| |
|
|
| |
Hock, yes, please do rip. |
| |
6500. Tom 7 (h-68-166-207-27.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) –
18 Dec 2007 11:30:55
[ Peeps on fire ]
Wow, this post is a lot more grammatical than I thought it would be.
Cort: We opted to use the real blowtorch.
Nels: Errr, sorry about that, but it was pretty awesome? |
| |
6498. Nels (gs5048.sp.cs.cmu.edu) –
18 Dec 2007 10:12:31
[ Peeps on fire ]
This reminds me of a party that I had once... I was cleaning peeps out of my microwave the entire next day! |
| |
6497. Charlie (dsl-198-144-43-38.city-net.com) –
18 Dec 2007 09:41:53
[ Peeps on fire ]
Yes, so this is what life is like after the thesis is done... |
| |
6496. Rob (pool-71-182-139-42.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net) –
18 Dec 2007 09:21:05
[ Peeps on fire ]
It's been far too long since Tom7 had free time. |
| |
6495. effika (ip72-200-200-243.ok.ok.cox.net) –
18 Dec 2007 08:51:01
[ Peeps on fire ]
It's been far too long since somebody set marshmallow confections on fire. |
| |
6494. Andrew (75-164-157-130.ptld.qwest.net) –
18 Dec 2007 08:19:53
[ Peeps on fire ]
Poor little peeps. What did they ever do to anyone? |
| |
6493. Cortney (pool-141-156-130-124.res.east.verizon.net) –
18 Dec 2007 08:09:39
[ Peeps on fire ]
Is that the creme brulee torch? |
| |
6491. Tom 6 (c-71-235-78-32.hsd1.ct.comcast.net) –
18 Dec 2007 06:14:14
[ Peeps on fire ]
Not my peeps! |
| |
Tom:
I plan on studying this intently, then either:
a) joining you in your conquest of the world, or if you choose not to do this,
b) ripping you off. |
| |
a preemptive congrats, tom. |
| |
It's not really absurd, except in the effort:payout ratio. The title of this post is from magnetic poetry on my fridge. |
| |
Congratulations! But how is it absurd? |
| |
Congrats tom you are awesome drink multiple brews for me |
| |
lets use our "bad" scores as motivation people. lets start studyn like we mean it. i AM getting a 2400-just watch me |
| |
|
|
| |
I see.
Congrats for finishing it anyway.
|
| |
Jonas: the 3007 is a joke (actually part of the thesis style file that I left in until the final version) and I know about the few missing citations, but the mistake on 110 is real and I fixed it. Thanks! |
| |
I found typos too.
On page i, in "Copyright (C) 3007 Tom Murphy VII", the year is after the first publishing.
On page 110, "ML5 closely resembles Standard ML [70] in syntax in semantics", the second "in" should probably be "and".
There are missing references like "[? " at some places, inclusing page 118, and 126.
|
| |
Awesome! See you tonight? |
| |
It's actually part of the thesis style file, I guess as a joke on the interminableness of the process. I'll feel better after I defend! |
| |
The more sober me says: congratulations. It must feel good to be done writing. |
| |